Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00937
Original file (PD 2013 00937.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX          CASE : PD -20 13 - 00937
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0513
Separation Date: 20020403


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (75B / Personnel Administration) medically separated for chronic pain, low back, mechanical, right shoulder and neck. The conditions could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent U3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The back, shoulder and neck conditions, characterized as “chronic mechanical low back pain(LBP)/facet syndrome; chronic right rotator cuff tendonopathy, and neck pain secondary to a C6-C7 herniated nucleus pulposus ” were forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB forwarded no other conditions to the PEB. The Informal PEB adjudicated chronic pain, low back, mechanical, right shoulder, due to rotator cuff tendonopathy and neck, due to C6-7 herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP) as unfitting and r ated 10% with application of US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. The CI made no appeals and was medically separated .


CI CONTENTION : “I am having more problems out of my feet” [ sic ]


 SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e . ( 2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting chronic pain, low back, mechanical, right shoulder and neck conditions are addressed below. The contended feet condition was not identified by the MEB or PEB; and, thus is not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. This, and any other condition or contention not requested in this application, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which her contended feet conditions continue to burden her. IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board’s role is thus confined to the review of medical records and all evidence at hand to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, compared to VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.


invalid font number 31502


RATING COMPARISON :
invalid font number 31502
Service IPEB – Dated 20020124
 VA* – 3 weeks Pre-Separation
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating C&P Exam
Chronic Pain: Mechanical Low Back; Right Shoulder; and Neck 5099-5003 10% Right Shoulder Tendonitis 5299-5203 10% 20020311
Herniated Nucleus Pulposus 5299-5293 10% 20020311
Lower Back Strain With Disc Bulge 5295-5293 10% 20020311
Other x 0 (Not in Scope)
 Other x8
Rating: 10%
 Combined: 60%
invalid font number 31502 * invalid font number 31502 Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20020506 (most proximate to date of separation 20020403) invalid font number 31502


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : The PEB combined the chronic pain, low back, mechanical, right shoulder, due to rotator cuff tendonopathy and neck, due to C6-7 HNP conditions under a single disability rating, coded analogously to 5003 a rthritis, degenerative (hypertrophic or osteoarthritis) code. This coding approach is countenanced by AR 635-40 (B.24 f.), but IAW DoDI 6040.44 the Board must apply only VASRD guidance to its recommendation. The Board must therefore apply separate codes and ratings in its recommendations if compensable ratings for each joint are achieved IAW VASRD §4.71a. If the Board judges that two or more separate ratings are warranted in such cases, however, it must satisfy the requirement that each “unbundled” condition was “reasonably justified” as separately unfitting.

Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain, Right Shoulder Pain and Neck Pain Conditions. The Board first considered if the chronic LBP, right shoulder pain, and neck pain, conditions, having been de-coupled from the combined PEB adjudication, remained independently unfitting as established above. Prior to entry into the Disability Evaluation System, the CI had multiple temporary profiles that document her low back and neck pain conditions caused duty limitations, while no profiles implicated the right shoulder in any duty limitation. There are numerous service treatment record (STR) notes that document evaluation and treatment of her neck and back pain both separately and individually. There is only one STR note that mentions a right shoulder condition and no STR notes document treatment for any right shoulder condition. The commander’s statement documented that the restrictions listed in her profile affected her ability to deploy to field training exercises and perform in her MOS and did not mention any specific condition. The well-established principle for fitness determinations is that they are performance-based. The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the STR that documented any significant interference of the right shoulder condition with the performance of duties at the time of separation. After due deliberation, members agreed that the evidence does not support a conclusion that the functional impairment from the right shoulder condition was integral to the CI’s inability to perform her MOS and accordingly cannot recommend a separate rating for it. Additionally, Board consensus was that the chronic LBP and chronic neck pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within her MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating.
Chronic L ow Back Pain Condition . The CI developed atraumatic LBP which presented as a dull ache with periodic exacerbations while in Germany in 1998. The pain was sharp three to four times a week, and lasted two to three hours. She was given a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) and a muscle relaxant and advised no pushups, sit-ups or lifting. She was again seen in family practice in 2000 for recurrent LBP which was worse with prolonged standing. The pain continued despite physical therapy (PT) and steroid injections. The physical exam findings were point tenderness in T2-T5. The CI continued to be followed by family practice for the chronic LBP throughout 2000 and 2001 without any improvement. PT was ordered and she underwent four visits without any decrease in LBP. A thoracic spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was normal. The neurosurgeon noted that a normal motor and sensory exam. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for upper back and neck pain with additional restrictions listed. A lumbar spine MRI performed showed a mild disc bulge at L5-S1. The MEB narrative summary (NARSUM) exam approximately 4 months prior to separation documented that the CI had worsening of the throbbing LBP which was located in the center of the back and there were one to two days per week where did not have LBP. She also reported constant slight pain that radiated down the left leg, with numbness of the entire leg and weakness. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized below.

The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 3 weeks prior to separation indicated that the CI had constant LBP that was 8/10 with 10 being the worst to 10/10 three to four times per week with prolonged walking, standing and sometimes with normal daily activities. The pain would last 2 to 24 hours with poor results from a prescription NSAID. The VA C&P physical exam findings are also summarized below.

There were two range - of - motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board considered ; as summarized in the chart below :

Thoracolumbar ROM (Degrees) MEB 4 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 3. 5 weeks Pre-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal) 75 80
Combined (240) 225 230
Comment Pos. painful motion; decreased sensation left lower extremity; Normal strength ; Pos. facet compression test on right Pos. painful motion & Tender ness to palpation; Pos. straight leg raise on left ; Normal gait
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%
5295 10% 10%
5292 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The 2002 VASRD coding and rating standards for the spine, which must be applied to the Board’s recommendation IAW DoDI 6040.44, differ significantly from the current §4.71a general rating formula for the spine. The earlier criteria were subject to the rater’s opinion regarding degree of severity, as opposed to the more objective current standards with quantifiable rating thresholds grounded in ROM measurements. The 2002 criteria relevant for consideration in the Board’s recommendation are cited in context below.

5292 Spine, limitation of motion of, lumbar
Severe ....................... ...............................    40
Moderate .................. ..............................        20
Slight ......................... ...............................  1 0

 5295 Lumbosacral strain:
Severe; with listing of whole' spine to opposite side, positive Goldthwaite's sign, marked limitation of forward bending in standing position, loss of lateral motion with osteo-arthritic changes, or narrowing or irregularity of joint space, or some of the above with abnormal mobility on forced motion ....... ..............................      40
With muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of lateral spine motion, unilateral, in standing' position ..... ...............................       2 0
With charact eristic pain on motion ........      1 0

The PEB coded the chronic pain, low back, mechanical condition as 5099 analogous to 5003 and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the l ower b ack s train with d isc b ulge as 5295 ( l umbosacral strain ) with 5293 ( i ntervertebral disc syndrome ) and rated at 10% , m ild-w ith characteristic pain on motion. Both exams accomplished proximate to separation documented a “slight” limitation of lumbar spine motion . The Board considered the coding of 5295 and a 10% rating-with characteristic pain on motion versus a 20% rating- with muscle spasm on extreme forward bending, loss of la teral spine motion, unilateral, in standing position; however , no examination documented muscle spasm or loss of lateral spine motion. The Board agreed that the evidence above more closely aligned with application of code 529 2 ( limitation of lumbar spine motion ) , because there was no identified injury to account for a muscle strain. There is no reasonable coding or rating scheme that would result in a rating greater rating than 10% . After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the c hronic mechanical LBP condition coded 5295.

Neck Pain Condition. The CI developed neck pain and underwent treatment in Germany which consisted of trigger point steroidal injections and PT in 1998; however, her pain continued . She was seen by PT on 30 August 2000 for cervical radiculitis. The cervical spine X- ray showed anterior osteophytes at C5-6 and a loss of lordosis. The cervical spine MRI demonstrated disc herniation at C6-7 in the right paracentral area with mild displacement of the thecal sac and a very small disc herniation at C5-6 in the left paracentral area. The CI was seen by PT for cervical radiculitis and did not respond to cervical traction . An electromyogram (EMG) performed on 1  May 2001 was normal. The n eurosurgeon noted bilateral upper extremity pain in the C7 distribution and axial neck pain . The MEB NARSUM exam documented a dull deep ache pain in the neck. The MEB NARSUM physical exam findings are summarized in the chart below.

 The VA C&P exam documented that the pain was constant 10/10, aggravated by prolonged sitting or turning her head quickly. The VA C& P physical exam findings are also summarized in the chart below.

There were two ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board considered ; as summarized in the chart below.

Cervical ROM (Degrees) MEB 4 Mo. Pre-Sep VA C&P 3. 5 weeks Pre-Sep
Flex (45 Normal) 40 35
Combined (340) 270 300
Comment Decreased sensation right arm; Normal strength except right shoulder external rotation; neg. cervical compression test Pos. Tenderness to palpation posterior neck; Pos. painful motion
§4.71a Rating 10% 10%

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB coded the chronic pain neck d ue to C6-7 HNP as 5099 analogous to 5003 and rated at 10% with application of the USAPDA pain policy. The VA coded the HNP condition as 5299 analogous to 5293 rated at 10% - Mild. The two codes most applicable codes from the VASRD in effect at the time of separation are copied below for the reader’s convenience:

5290 Spine, limitation of motion of, cervical:
Severe ........................................................................................  30
Moderate ..................................................................................      20
Slight .........................................................................................         10

5293 Intervertebral disc syndrome:
Pronounced; with persistent symptoms compatible with sciatic neuropathy with characteristic pain and demonstrable muscle spasm, absent ankle jerk, or other neurological findings appropriate to site of diseased disc, little intermittent relief ...   60
Severe; recurring attacks, with intermittent relief…………………      40
Moderate; recurring attacks .....................................................        20
Mild ...........................................................................................         10
Postoperative, cured .................................................................   0

While the CI did compla in of radicular symptoms related to her neck pain, her EMG and nerve condition study w ere normal, there was no documented muscle spasm or absent reflexes. Under code 5293 her neck pain condition would be appropriately rated 10% as applied by the VA. Both exams accomplished proximate to separation document ed pain limited motion with a “slight” limitation in motion. There is no reasonable coding rating scheme that would result in a rating greater than 10%. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 10% for the chronic neck pain condition coded 5290.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy for rating the chronic pain, low back, mechanical, right shoulder, due to rotator cuff tendonopathy and neck, due to C6-7 HNP conditions was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. As discussed above, the PEB bundled the three conditions and the Board adjudicated each condition separately. In the matter of the chronic mechanical LBP conditio n, the Board , on a split 2:1 vote, recommends that it was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 529 2 IAW VASRD §4.71a. The single voter for dissent did not elect to submit a minority opinion. In the matter of the neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees that it was separately unfitting and unanimously recommends a disability rating of 10%, coded 529 0 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the right shoulder pain condition, the Board , by a vote of 2:1 , recommends that it was not separately unfitting and therefore, cannot recommend it for additional disability rating. The minority voter did not elect to submit a minority opinion. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Mechanical Low Back Pain 529 2 1 0%
Neck Pain, due to C6-7 Herniated Nucleus Pulposus 529 0 10%
Right Shoulder Pain , Due To Rotator Cuff Tendonopathy Not Unfitting
COMBINED 2 0%
invalid font number 31502

The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130606 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record








                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, AR20140020814 (PD2010300937)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:

Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02524

    Original file (PD-2013-02524.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 6.5 months after separation documented that the CI had constant daily neck pain rated at 7/10, neck stiffness occurred with turning the neck to any side with radiation down both upper extremities with feelings of hand weakness during an acute exacerbation. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00808

    Original file (PD2012 00808.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The MEB forwarded chronic back pain and chronic neck pain as medically unacceptablefor Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudication IAW AR 40-501.The PEB adjudicated the “chronic pain, neck and LBP, without neurologic abnormality” as unfitting, rated together as 10% with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy. In the matter of the “unbundled” chronic neck pain condition, the Board unanimously agrees it was not separately unfitting and that it cannot...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01753

    Original file (PD-2013-01753.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Neck Pain Condition . BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication.The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised.In the matter of the LBP condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00909

    Original file (PD-2014-00909.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVeterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The Board next considered if there was evidence of a functionally impairing radiculopathy due to the low back condition to provide additional rating. The Board considered the evidence in record supports thatthe CI’s...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01533

    Original file (PD-2013-01533.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB adjudicated “TBI with residual neck pain and headaches;” “low back pain (LBP);” and “left knee pain with degenerative joint disease (DJD),” as unfitting, rated at 10%, 10%, and 0% respectively, with application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board could not find evidence in the commander’s statement or elsewhere in the treatment record that documented any significant interference of the neck pain condition with the performance of...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00078

    Original file (PD2013 00078.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was evaluated for reported symptoms of paresthesias of the right upper extremity, but cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on 9 January 2001 did not show spinal canal stenosis or nerve encroachment and nerve conduction studies on 13 April 2001 did not show any evidence of radicuolpathy.The CI was involved in another MVA on 26 June 2001 and was seen in the ER for “right shoulder, neck and low back pain;” the exam noted only right trapezius muscle tenderness, no spinal tenderness,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00080

    Original file (PD2013 00080.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Separation Date: 20011225 SUMMARY OF CASE :Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty Specialist/E4 (52C10/Utilities Equipment Repairer) medically separated for “ chronic lower back pain(LBP) secondary to L5-S1 herniated nucleus pulposus(HNP)without neurologic abnormality or documented chronic paravertebral muscle spasms.” Despite neurology and neurosurgery evaluations, extensive physical therapy, and medications, the...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01525

    Original file (PD-2014-01525.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. The CI was given a permanent U3 profile for cervical degenerative disease (neck pain) and another medical condition, with a Code C and specific restrictions noted on the profile.The VA C&P exam approximately 2 months prior to separation documented that the CI reported...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 00590

    Original file (PD2012 00590.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Both the PEB and VA used invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 spine rules in effect at the time of separation invalid font number 31502 to rate the LBP condition invalid font number 31502 ; these criteria changed invalid font number 31502 2 months invalid font number 31502 after separation invalid font number 31502 , as noted above invalid font number 31502 .The MEB NARSUM exam contains ROM measurements and forward flexion is recorded as “ full forward flexion to greater...